野生大豆抗旱性研究进展

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 干旱胁迫是作物面临的重要非生物胁迫之一,对作物的生长和产量构成严重威胁。本文作者概述了干旱胁迫对野生大豆形态发育、生理生化特性及抗旱分子遗传基础的影响,总结了近年来该领域的研究进展,并探讨了胁迫记忆、泛基因组等新兴概念与技术在其抗旱机制解析与育种中的应用前景,以期为培育高产抗旱的栽培大豆新品种奠定更全面的理论基础。

关键词: 野生大豆, 干旱胁迫, 形态生理, 基因定位, 胁迫记忆

姚瑞, 葛家良, 李月婷, 黄超, 孔维键, 吴禹. 野生大豆抗旱性研究进展[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2026, 0(5): 138-141.

[1] Duan Z,Xu L,Zhou G,et al.Unlocking soybean potential: geneticresources and omics for breeding[J].J Genet Genomics, 2025,52(11):1337-1346.
[2] Zeb A.A comprehensive review on different classes of polyphenolic compounds present in edible oils[J].Food Res Int,2021, 143:110312.
[3] 谢梦真,马俊奎.大豆抗旱生理研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2022,50(5):12-14.
[4] 任洪雷,朱筱,张丰屹,等.干旱胁迫的影响及抗旱性研究进展[J/OL].分子植物育种,1-10[2024-1-22].kns.cnki.net.
[5] Hyten D L,Song Q,Zhu Y,et al.Impacts of genetic bottlenecks on soybean genome diversity[J].Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,2006, 103(45):16666-16671.
[6] Kofsky J,Zhang H, Song B H.The Untapped Genetic Reservoir: The Past, Current, and Future Applications of the Wild Soybean(Glycine soja)[J].Front Plant Sci,2018,9:949.
[7] 郑世英,郑晓彤,耿建芬,等.硅对干旱胁迫下野生大豆幼苗生长和生理特性的影响[J].大豆科学,2018,37(2):263-267.
[8] Prince S J, Song L,Qiu D, et al.Genetic variants in root architecture-related genes in a Glycine soja accession, a potential resource to improve cultivated soybean[J].BMC Genomics,2015, 16(1):132.
[9] 崔杰印,武婷婷,宋雯雯,等.黑龙江中上游地区早熟野生大豆种质资源的抗旱性鉴定[J].植物遗传资源学报,2018,19(6):1073-1082.
[10] Lin S, Zhang W, Wang G, et al.Physiological Regulation of Photosynthetic-Related Indices, Antioxidant Defense, and Proline Anabolism on Drought Tolerance of Wild Soybean (Glycine soja L.)[J]. Plants(Basel),2024,13(6):880.
[11] 刘英,王尧旭,邹新竹,等.作物干旱胁迫响应机制与抗旱分子育种策略[J].生物工程学报,2025,41(11):4419-4442.
[12] Manavalan L P, Guttikonda S K, Tran L S, et al.Physiological and molecular approaches to improve drought resistance in soybean[J]. Plant Cell Physiol,2009,50(7):1260-1276.
[13] Maricle R B,Lee W R .Aerenchyma development and oxygen transport in the estuarine cordgrasses Spartina alterniflora and S. anglica[J].Aquatic Botany,2002,74(2):109-120.
[14] 可静,李进,李永洁.干旱胁迫下黑果枸杞幼苗对外源水杨酸的生理响应[J].植物生理学报,2016,52(4):497-504.
[15] 黄国宾,张晓海,杨双龙,等.渗透调节参与循环干旱锻炼提高烟草植株抗旱性的形成[J].植物生理学报,2012,48(5):465-471.
[16] 张秀玲,孙颖,孟岩,等.干旱胁迫下外源水杨酸对野生大豆生理特性的影响[J].中国野生植物资源,2022,41(1):9-12,19.
[17] Flexas J, Ribas-Carbó M, Diaz-Espejo A,et al.Mesophyll conductance to CO₂: current knowledge and future prospects[J]. Plant Cell Environ. 2008,31(5):602-621.
[18] Naithani J K,Ewers E B,Pendall E.Sap flux-scaled transpiration and stomatal conductance response to soil and atmospheric drought in a semi-arid sagebrush ecosystem[J].Journal of Hydrology,2012,464:465176-465185.
[19] Sun X L,Luo X,Sun M Z,et al.A Glycine soja 14-3-3 protein GsGF14o participates in stomatal and root hair development and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana[J].Plant & cell physiology,2014,55(1):99-118.
[20] Dumanoviĉ J, Nepovimova E, Natiĉ M, et al.The Significance of reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense system in plants: A Concise Overview[J].Front Plant Sci,2021,11:552969.
[21] Agarwal S, Sairam K R, Srivastava C G, et al.Changes in antioxidant enzymes activity and oxidative stress by abscisic acid and salicylic acid in wheat genotypes[J]. Biologia Plantarum, 2005, 49(4):541-550.
[22] Mittler R.Oxidative stress,antioxidants and stress tolerance[J].Trends Plant Sci,2002,7(9):405-410.
[23] 胡晓晨. TGA转录因子通过调节或响应氧化还原稳态促进拟南芥根的生长[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2025.
[24] Farooq M,Wahid A,Kobayashi, N.et al.Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management[J].Agronomy for Sustainable Development,2009,29(1):185-212.
[25] 郑世英,王景平,李士平.干旱胁迫对野生及栽培大豆幼苗生理特性及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2014, 32(3):35-38.
[26] Zhou Y, Liu W, Li X, et al.Integration of sRNA, degradome, transcriptome analysis and functional investigation reveals gma-miR398c negatively regulates drought tolerance via GmCSDs and GmCCS in transgenic Arabidopsis and soybean[J].BMC Plant Biol,2020,20(1):190.
[27] Kambona C M, Koua P A, Léon J,et al.Stress memory and its regulation in plants experiencing recurrent drought conditions[J].Theor Appl Genet,2023,136(2):26.
[28] Nguyen T C, Tran H A, Lee J D, et al.Genetic control of tolerance to drought stress in wild soybean(Glycine soja) at the vegetative and the germination Stages[J]. Plants(Basel),2024,13(14):1894.
[29] 张小芳,王冰冰,徐燕,等.PEG模拟干旱胁迫下野生大豆转录组分析[J].大豆科学,2018,37(5):681-689.
[30] Liu C,Chen X,Han W,et al.A wild-allele GsPP2C-51-a1 enhances tolerance to drought stress in soybean and Arabidopsis[J].Theor Appl Genet,2025,138(3):51.
[31] Nisa Z,Mallano A I, Yu Y,et al.GsSNAP33, a novel Glycine soja SNAP25-type protein gene: Improvement of plant salt and drought tolerances in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana[J].Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017,119:9-20.
[32] Sun X,Sun M,Luo X,et al.A Glycine soja ABA-responsive receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase, GsRLCK, positively controls plant tolerance to salt and drought stresses[J].Planta,2013,237(6):1527-1545.
[33] Liu Y, Cao L, Wu X, et al.Functional characterization of wild soybean(Glycine soja) GsSnRK1.1 protein kinase in plant resistance to abiotic stresses[J].J Plant Physiol,2023,280:153881.
[34] Fernandez C T,Nestor B J,Danilevicz M F,et al.Pangenomes as a Resource to Accelerate Breeding of Under-Utilised Crop Species[J].Int J Mol Sci,2022,23(5):2671.
[35] Wang H, Qin F.Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals Natural Variations Contributing to Drought Resistance in Crops[J].Front Plant Sci,2017,8:1110.

野生大豆抗旱性研究进展

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者中心

审稿中心

期刊信息

联系方式

[1]	崔晓光, 李月婷, 黄超, 杨子桐. 野生大豆种质资源研究进展及应用建议[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2025, 0(3): 24-26.
[2]	李月婷, 陈爱国, 孟未来, 崔晓光, 黄超, 姚瑞, 葛家良, 吴禹. 野生大豆萌发期耐冷种质资源筛选及综合评价[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2025, 0(1): 56-63.
[3]	李月婷, 陈爱国, 李兆波, 孟未来, 崔晓光, 黄超, 吴禹. 辽宁南部不同产区野生大豆种质资源蛋白质差异及抗病性评价分析[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2024, 0(6): 124-129.
[4]	王庆云, 丁秀. 干旱胁迫对玉米幼苗ROS和POD的影响[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2024, 0(3): 80-82.
[5]	魏志敏, 吕玮, 赵宇, 崔纪菡, 王京新, 赵文庆, 裴美燕, 刘建军, 李顺国. PEG胁迫对4种颜色藜麦种子萌发的影响[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2024, 0(1): 88-90.
[6]	陈爱国, 李月婷, 崔晓光, 吴禹. 吉林省野生大豆考察收集与评价[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2023, 0(7): 139-143.
[7]	杨珍, 赵军, 张德, 张树庚. 干旱对不同基因型玉米种子产量和产量构成因素的影响研究[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2023, 0(4): 38-41.
[8]	刘云峰, 宋志启, 祁志伦, 李文金. 外施水杨酸对干旱胁迫下大豆抗性的影响[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2022, 0(9): 90-93.
[9]	王庆云, 郭红霞. 干旱胁迫对玉米幼苗抗氧化物酶及GAPDH的影响[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2022, 0(3): 154-156.
[10]	潘淼, 魏静宇, 魏进华. PEG模拟干旱对5种观赏草种子萌发的影响[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2021, 0(8): 97-100.